|  | <<  
             ^ 
              >> 
            
              | Date: 1998-04-16 
 
 GILC-Alert: Die Kyber/Welt im Ueberblick-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 
 q/depesche 98.4.16
 
 GILC-Alert: Die Kyber/Welt im Ueberblick
 
 Es ist ein garstig und ein schönes Bild zugleich, das dieser
 Überblick von Kontinenten fünf vermittelt: Zensurversuche
 allüberall durch Paragraphen oder Filtersoftware.
 Aber auch wie man mit klugen Klagen & obersten Gerichtshöfen so
 manchen besonders dreisten Zensur/Gesetzvorschlag einer
 Abschiessung zuführt...
 
 GILC-Alert wird von der American Civil Liberties' Union für die
 Global Internet Liberty Campaign produziert.
 
 
 
 
 [A] FOREMOST NEWS
 [A1] GILC Issues Statement at OECD Meeting
 [B] ROUNDUP OF GLOBAL INTERNET ISSUES
 [B1] Africa/Middle East
 [B1.1] Israel Debates Internet Censorship
 [B1.2] Algeria Freedom Fighter Continues Fight on Internet
 [B2] Asia/Oceania
 [B2.1] India and Telephony
 [B3] Europe
 [B3.1] Report: European Union Set to Reject Key Escrow for
 Cryptography
 [B3.2] Irish Bill Takes Aim at Child Pornography
 [B4] North America
 [B4.1] Court Strikes Down Virtual Child Pornography Law
 [B4.2] Virginia's Library Filtering Scheme Unconstitutional
 [B4.3] Netscape Plans on Adopting PICS
 [B4.4] Canada Set to Move on Encryption
 [B4.5] "Democracies Online" Formed
 [B5] SOUTH AMERICA
 [B5.1] Brazil and Internet
 
 
 [A] FOREMOST NEWS
 [A1] GILC Issues Statement at OECD Meeting
 
 On March 25th, 1998 members of GILC attended an OECD one day
 meeting
 on "International Co-operation Concerning Content and Conduct on
 the
 Internet", in Paris, and issued a member statement on "Impact of
 Self-Regulation and Filtering on Human Rights to Freedom of
 Expression." The statement details the importance of freedom of
 speech
 and freedom of expression to the online community.  It also
 explains
 the essential role anonymous communications plays in the struggle
 for
 human rights.  Among other things, the statement notes: "Global
 rating
 or labeling systems squelch the free flow of information: Efforts
 to
 force all Internet speech to be labeled or rated according to a
 single
 classification system distorts the fundamental cultural diversity
 of
 the Internet and will lead to domination of one set of political
 or
 moral viewpoints. Such systems will either be easy to use and not
 have
 enough categories for all cultures or it will have so many
 categories
 to cater for all cultures that it will be unusable. These systems
 are
 antithetical to the Internet and should be rejected."
 
 The GILC statement:
 http://www.gilc.org/speech/ratings/gilc-oecd-398.html
 
 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B] ROUNDUP OF GLOBAL INTERNET ISSUES
 [B1] Africa/Middle East
 [B1.1] Israel Debates Internet Censorship
 
 The Business Arena reported that the Israeli Knesset Committee for
 Scientific and Technological Research and Development sought to
 "explore the possible imposition of censorship on information
 distributed over the Internet." Lawmakers heard testimony from
 many
 sources.  The paper reports that one "Yeshiva student told
 horrified
 [members] . . . . that he had reached pornographic sites 'while
 searching for automobiles.'"  The author of the piece then went on
 to
 argue: "All I ask is why this never happens to me! In the hundreds
 of
 surfing hours I have notched up in the past two years, never once
 has
 a pornographic site popped up by accident.  Never have I keyed in
 'law' and got 'sex.'"  The article warns that if Israel "imposes
 any
 censorship whatsoever on the Internet, it will fall in line with
 such
 model democracies as the Chinese Republic, Singapore and various
 Arab
 regimes."
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B1.2] Algeria Freedom Fighter Continues Fight on Internet
 
 Algeria is a country where the government deals with even
 suspected
 opposition brutally: executions, decapitations, rapes, kidnappings
 and
 other forms of torture are daily nightmares.  Needless to say, the
 government outlaws newspapers critical of the extremist  and
 armed 
 Islamic groups, who allegedly have massacred more than 80,000
 people
 since elections were suspended in 1992.  La Nation was one such
 paper
 until it's editor, Salima Ghezali (who won the European
 Parliament's
 
 
 prestigious Sakharov award), took the paper to the Internet last
 year.
 Ghezali is the only female editor of a major Muslim newspaper and
 practices what she calls "guerrilla journalism."  The Guardian
 (London) quotes her saying: "Over one 100 people are now being
 killed
 every week.  This barbarity now seems normal, but of course it is
 not.
 The regime is so arrogant that if there is no condemnation of its
 human rights abuses it will believe it has carte blanche."
 
 For more information: http://www.ifex.org/alert/00000298.html
 
 More information in French:
 http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/md/Forum/algerie/msg00011.html
 
 An interview with Ghezali: http://www.merip.org/ghezali.htm
 
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 [B2] Asia/Oceania
 [B2.1] India and Telephony
 
 Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL), the overseas
 telecommunications
 arm of the Indian government, announced that customers would be
 disconnected if they used Internet telephony to dial overseas (a
 fraction of the cost that a normal telephone call would cost).
 Asia-Pacific Telecommunications reported that VSNL may actually be
 blocking access to certain companies that provide Internet
 telephony
 software.  If VSNL is doing this, the paper argues: "it would seem
 illegal, because it amounts to censorship and a restriction of the
 freedom guaranteed to all Indians under the Constitution. If VSNL
 is
 shutting [them] out, there are other Web sites which offer voice
 connectivity."
 
 VSNL's policy can be found at: http://www.vsnl.net.in/
 
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 [B3] Europe
 [B3.1] Report: European Union Set to Reject Key Escrow for
 Cryptography
 
 On April 2, 1998, the Intelligence Newsletter reported that the
 European Commission is about to complete a draft directive aimed
 at
 digital signatures and computer privacy. The EC draft leaves out
 any
 use of Trusted Third Parties (TTPs), key escrow or key recovery
 systems.  This draft will be submitted for public comment in
 Copenhagen on April 23rd -April 24th.  Furthermore, the Newsletter
 quotes from a recently released November 1996 memorandum from the
 office of William Reinch, the U.S. Commerce Department's
 undersecretary for export administration: "he acknowledged that
 key
 escrow by a TTP was 'more costly and less efficient' than
 non-escrowed
 products."
 
 Read GILC's Cryptography and Liberty: An International Survey of
 Encryption Policy, February 1998, at
 http://www.gilc.org/crypto/crypto-survey.html.
 
 Read Cyber-Rights & Cyber-Liberties (UK), "First Report on UK
 Encryption Policy" is available at
 http://www.leeds.ac.uk/law/pgs/yaman/ukdtirep.htm.
 
 Read "Scrambling for Safety" Conference Web site is at
 http://www.privacy.org/pi/conference/dti/.
 
 Read the Walsh Report, "Review of policy relating to encryption
 technologies": http://www.efa.org.au/Issues/Crypto/Walsh/
 
 Read Kryptographie, Cryptography resources in German from FITUG,
 at
 http://www.fitug.de/ulf/krypto/.
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B3.2] Irish Bill Takes Aim at Computer Child Pornography
 
 The Irish Minister of Justice formally introduced to the Dail the
 Child Trafficking and Pornography Bill which would criminalize
 possession of sexually explicit material involving people under 17
 years of age.  The Irish Times notes that the Minister fears that
 without the law, pedophiles would try and use the Internet to
 molest
 people under 17 years (the age of consent).  The paper quotes
 O'Donoghue: "The offense of possession will apply where, for
 example,
 a person downloads child pornography from the Internet.  This
 means
 that any person who would try and circumvent the legislation by
 means
 of computer technology would not succeed."
 
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 [B4] North America
 [B4.1] Court Strikes Down Virtual Child Pornography Law
 
 A federal district court in Portland, Maine has struck down a
 portion
 of the Child Pornography Protection Act of 1996. While old
 definitions
 of child pornography required prosecutors to prove that the
 "child"
 was in fact under the age of consent, the new federal law outlawed
 "any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video,
 picture,
 or computer or computer-generated image or picture . . . of
 sexually
 explicit conduct, where . . . such depiction is, or appears to be,
 of
 a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct."  U.S. District
 Judge
 Gene Carter found that the inclusion of computer images that
 merely
 "appear" to show minors engaged in sex to be too broad and would
 restrict adult expression: "The statute impacts a significant
 amount
 of adult pornography featuring adults who appear youthful," Carter
 wrote in his 11-page decision. "The court concludes that
 expression
 involving such adults will be chilled by the subjective language
 of
 the statute." Carter is the first federal judge to find the law
 unconstitutional.
 
 Read Cnet article: http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,20722,00.html
 
 Read the Act: ftp://ftp.loc.gov/pub/thomas/c104/h4331.ih.txt
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B4.2] Virginia's Library Filtering Scheme Unconstitutional
 
 Relying  and drawing heavily from  the U.S. Supreme Court's
 landmark
 Reno v. ACLU decision last summer, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema of the
 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia,
 invalidated
 a local, board-approved library-filtering program.  Not only, she
 said, did the government misconstrue the nature of the Internet,
 but
 she also held that "the Library Board may not adopt and enforce
 content-based restrictions on access to protected Internet speech
 unless it meets the highest level of constitutional scrutiny."
 She
 dismissed the government's argument that blocking software is
 simply
 another form of a librarian selecting the books and periodicals to
 put
 in the library: she noted that cyber-publications only exist in
 cyberspace and do not "take up shelf space or require physical
 maintenance of any kind."  Furthermore, Judge Brinkema noted that
 while library books cost money, and therefore, necessitate certain
 purchasing decisions, cyber-publications cost no money.  Rather,
 "it
 costs a library more to restrict the content of its collection by
 means of blocking software than it does for the library to offer
 unrestricted access to all Internet publications."
 
 Read the Cnet article:
 http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,20920,00.html
 
 Read the ACLU press release:
 http://www.aclu.org/news/n040798a.html
 
 Read the ACLU's complaint:
 http://www.aclu.org/court/loudoncocomplaint.html
 Read the Judge's entire decision:
 http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/loudon/80407mem.htm
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B4.3] Netscape Plans on Adopting PICS
 
 The popular Internet browser, Netscape, has recently announced
 that by
 the end of this month, its newest version (Netscape Communicator
 4.05)
 will adopt the controversial Platform for Internet Content
 Selection
 content-rating and content-filtering scheme.  Netscape will call
 its
 implementation of PICS NetWatch and will launch in German with
 English
 and other versions to follow shortly thereafter. PC World News
 Radio
 quotes Cassidy Sehgal, an attorney working on cyber-issues for the
 American Civil Liberties Union (a GILC founding member), who is
 concerned about the Netscape development: "There are serious
 long-term
 implications.  I think that people need to realize that it's not
 as
 simple as turning [the filter] on and off . . . because what will
 happen now is if you want your speech to be read you're going to
 have
 to rate [your site].  That is antithetical to First Amendment
 views."
 
 Read GILC comments on PICS:
 http://www.gilc.org/speech/ratings/gilc-pics-submission.html
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B4.4] Canada Sets the Stage for Encryption Action
 
 On March 31, 1998, leaders of Canada's cryptography industry and
 privacy advocates met in Ottawa to discuss and suggest an
 encryption
 plan for Canada. Wired News reported that "the consensus among the
 group was that Canada should continue its current stance of not
 implementing any domestic crypto controls, and liberalize its
 existing
 export policies."  The article quotes David Jones, president of
 Electronic Frontier Canada (EFC is a GILC founding member): "We
 are
 firmly opposed to any policy or legislation that would prohibit
 the
 export of encryption of encryption products, either stored or
 transmitted."  In February, the Canadian government invited public
 comment when it issued "A Cryptography Policy Framework for
 Electronic
 Commerce," where it depicts several different cryptography
 possibilities.  According to Mark Hughes, executive director of
 the
 Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues said: "its call for
 public
 comment is, in my view, a cruel joke because the paper was only
 just
 issued (February 21, 1998) and all public comment must be made by
 April 21, 1998.  As few Canadians comprehend what encryption is
 and
 how it affects them, two months is simply not enough time for
 Canadians to sufficiently educate themselves in order to make
 informed
 comments on the future of their electronic privacy."
 Read Wired story: http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/1
 
 Canada's "Framework" proposal:
 http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/cy00005e.html
 
 Electronic Frontier Canada: http://insight.mcmaster.ca/org/efc
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 [B4.5] "Democracies Online" Formed
 
 Housed at the Center for Democracy and Citizenship at the Hubert
 H.
 Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota, a
 new
 organization dedicated "to build[ing] a strong foundation for
 improving democracy as democracies around the world converge with
 information networks" has just formed.  "Democracies Online" will
 provide a twice-monthly newsletter ("Democracy Notes") that will
 objectively cover trends, issues, and efforts related to the
 convergence of democracy and information networks.  "Democracies
 Online" will also supply a newswire and  online peer networks.
 The
 organization also proposes to host a Democracies Online World
 Virtual
 Summit in the Fall of 1998.
 
 They can be found at: http://www.e-democracy.org/do
 
 To subscribe either to the newswire or the Notes: send an e-mail
 message to: listserv@tc.umn.edu  In the body of your message,
 write:
 subscribe do-wire "Your Name (Place)" To join both the Newswire
 and
 Democracy Notes, send the following two lines: subscribe do-wire
 "Your
 Name (Place)" subscribe do-notes "Your Name (Place)"
 
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
 [B5] SOUTH AMERICA
 [B5.1] Brazil and Internet
 
 Internet access in Brazil had been limited to wealthy English
 speakers
 with good telephone lines.  Reuters recently reported that the
 situation is slowly changing: "there are signs that the Internet
 is
 becoming more accessible.  The paper cites to a survey released
 late
 last month that covers many aspects of Internet usage in South
 America's largest country. According to the survey, more women are
 traveling the information superhighway (17% used it in 1996
 compared
 to 25% in 1997).  Language is also becoming less of an obstacle:
 whereas 68% of Brazilian, Internet-users understood English in
 1996,
 today only 58% do.  "The surveys showed Brazilian Internet users
 to
 have many traits in common with their American counterparts: most
 are
 well-informed (68% subscribe to a newspaper or magazine) and most
 are
 adults (34% are 20 to 30 years old, 24% are aged 30 to 40)."
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Raafat S. Toss
 GILC Organizer Developer
 American Civil Liberties Union
 125 Broad Street
 New York, New York 10004
 212.549.2559
 212.549.2656 (fax)
 rtoss@aclu.org
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 Links to all information in this alert can be found at
 http://www.gilc.org
 
 You are welcome to pass the GILC ALERT to all who may be
 interested.
 And you have permission to re-print GILC ALERT and distribute it.
 
 If you are not a subscriber but would like to be, please send an
 email
 to gilc-announce@gilc.org with the following message in the body:
 
 Subscribe gilc-announce <your email address>
 
 PUBLICATION OF THIS NEWSLETTER IS MADE POSSIBLE BY A GRANT FROM
 THE
 OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE (OSI)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 edited by Harkank
 published on: 1998-04-16
 comments to office@quintessenz.at
 subscribe Newsletter
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 <<  
                   ^ 
                    >>
 |  |  |  |